For competitive reasons, the client has decided to participate anonymously in this story. Should you decide to go through the sales cycle with LEAPWORK, we are able to provide a reference call.
A major utility company manages critical energy infrastructure, and as such, it operates in a high-risk environment. System failures at any point can be extremely costly, so processes need to be incredibly robust and thoroughly tested.
Service desk requests, for example from energy suppliers, is an example of a critical process that simply must not break. At the utility company, these requests are all managed with the business process platform, ServiceNow.
The ServiceNow-based business processes include both support requests from external stakeholders (suppliers and end-users of gas and electricity), internal IT service requests, and then communication with vendors of IT products and services.
ServiceNow releases major updates to their platform twice a year. For each release, IT Service Management at the utility company had to test all their ServiceNow-based processes before rolling out the latest version to the entire organization to make sure that the flows had not been broken by the system upgrade.
The problem was, the company didn’t have a team dedicated to do testing and monitoring of the ServiceNow application, so for each upgrade, IT Process Manager, Dean Simonsen, and his team had to rely on specialists across the organization to help with manual testing. This was highly problematic for several reasons:
This inefficient approach to verifying whether business flows would work with a new release of ServiceNow would delay the roll-out of the latest system version. As such, the company would not be able to take advantage of new platform features as quickly as they wanted to. This could lead to missed opportunities for doing things smarter in the business. Furthermore, delayed system upgrades posed a challenge to the IT teams, because ServiceNow eventually phases out support for legacy versions of their platform.
To utilize ServiceNow better, to reduce risks of critical system bugs and security breaches, and to improve the quality of how service desk requests were handled, process automation was the obvious solution.
Simonsen and the team were evaluating the different solutions on the market to solve their automation requirements. Specifically, they were looking for an RPA platform that would allow both technical users and non-developers to build and execute automation flows across functions – in and beyond ServiceNow processes.
With the LEAPWORK Automation Platform, Simonsen and his team could automate the testing of business flows going across functions and departments involving multiple applications, including ServiceNow.
Simonsen completed a Proof of Concept of LEAPWORK for the IT Service Management department, but business management could easily see how the platform could be used for optimizing processes in several areas of the organization.
“I quickly demonstrated LEAPWORK to one of my colleagues, and I could just see how his face lightened up,” Simonsen said. “The possibilities for automation are endless.”
With LEAPWORK, the company automated tests of the visitation, assignment, and follow-up of service desk requests both from external and internal stakeholders.
The team built approximately 60 automation flows for verifying that ServiceNow-based processes run as intended and are handled properly. In relation to upgrades of ServiceNow, automation flows are run in both development and test environments once a day to ensure continuous testing of the specific modules of ServiceNow that are being changed.
Automation of business processes requires strict documentation of what is automated and how it works. With the LEAPWORK Automation Platform, all executed flows are automatically captured with video recordings, which served as great documentation for Simonsen and the team.
LEAPWORK does not require users to develop an extensive framework to support automation, and once built, the LEAPWORK automation flows require limited effort in terms of maintenance compared to other automation tools applied in the organization.