When businesses calculate their ROI, they usually compare the time it takes to manually test a case against the time it takes to automate the same case. While this is useful information, it doesn’t show the full picture.
It’s important to consider the time it takes to implement, the maintenance work needed, and the time required to analyze why a test has failed. All of these have costs and impact the overall productivity of your team and business.
Since build and maintenance costs of test automation are often left out of an ROI calculation, this can lead to unmet expectations on automation projects. As a result, they fail. This has caused businesses to search for new approaches to test automation that keeps build times and maintenance to a minimum.
Enter no-code test automation.
No-code test automation is a testing solution that enables businesses to sharpen their competitive edge, reduce risk, and improve the quality of their applications and software.
In this post, we’ll explain what no-code test automation is, how it works in the case of Leapwork, and why no-code has the best ROI.
No-code (also referred to as codeless or scriptless) test automation requires no coding skills to develop a test case. It exists to make the onboarding, build time, and maintenance of automation as simple as possible, while still being able to automate complex test scenarios.
Rather than using lines of code to build automated test cases, no-code test automation with Leapwork uses a different technique. We remove unnecessary complexity and visualize text cases with a universal language that anyone can understand: flow charts.
The user only sees the most necessary actions - they can even create sub-flows to package larger elements of a test case- and testers can get a better overview of steps and detect if a change should be made to a test.
In the video above there is an example of how no-code and code-based automation work. It shows the functional testing of a website to verify that mandatory fields on a form are working as they should, with a codeless test being built on the left (using Leapwork) and a script-based test (using Selenium) on the right.
As we established in the introduction, the implementation, build and maintenance times associated with traditional approaches to test automation (like Selenium) often outweigh the benefit of using test automation in the first place. With tools like Leapwork, the time spent on building and maintaining can be limited drastically.
Leapwork’s no code test automation enables teams to:
Want to learn more about calculating the ROI of test automation? We’ve created a short guide, listing what you should consider as part of your ROI calculation.